III.2.5.3 Соглашения о реадмиссии

Вопросы для обсуждения

Являются ли нормы-гарантии соглашений о реадмиссии достаточными?

Ключевые понятия, проблемы и дискуссии

Цели соглашений о реадмисии:

  • Стремление ЕС гарантировать возврат нелегальных иммигрантов, даже если государство-участник соглашения было лишь транзитной страной въезда в ЕС
  • Правила доказывания и предполагаемых доказательств гражданства и транзитного маршрута
  • Нормы-гарантии

ДокументыЕС

  1. Agreement between the European Community and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation, 19 December 2007.
  2. Agreement between the European Union and Pakistan on Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation, OJ L 287/50, 7 October 2010.
  3. European Commission, Communication to the European Parliament and the Council, ‘An Evaluation of EU Readmission Agreements’, COM (2011) 76 final, Brussels, 23 February 2011.
  4. Agreement between the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and the European Community on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation, 27 November 2002.
  5. Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, COM (2005) 391, 1 September 2005.
  6. Agreement between the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka and the European Community on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorization: SEC (2003) 255, 21 March 2003.
  7. Agreement between the European Community and the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation: OJ 2004 L 143/97, 30 April 2004.
  8. Agreement between the Republic of Albania and the European Community on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation, COM(2004) 92, 12 February 2004.
  9. Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on Readmission, OJ L 129, 17 May 2007.
  10. Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the Readmission of Persons, 29 November 2007.
  11. Agreement between the European Community and Bosnia and Herzegovina on Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation, 19 December 2007.
  12. Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Montenegro on Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation, 19 December 2007.
  13. Agreement between the European Community and Serbia on Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation, 19 December 2007.
  14. Соглашение между Российской Федерацией и Европейским сообществом о реадмиссии, 25 мая 2006.
  15. Соглашения о реадмиссии со странами Западных Балкан (краткое содержание).
  16. Решение Совета 2005/371/EC от 3 марта 2005 года о подписании Соглашения между Европейским Сообществом и Республикой Албания о реадмиссии лиц, проживающих без разрешения (краткое содержание).

Материалыдлячтения

Основныематериалы

  1. A. Roig and T. Huddelston, ‘EC Readmission Agreements: A Re-evaluation of the Political Impasse’, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 9, no. 3 (2007), pр. 362–387.
  2. M. Schieffer, ‘Readmission and Repatriation of Illegal Residents’, in B. Martenczuk and van S. Thiel (eds), Justice, Liberty and Security: New challenges for EU External Relations (Brussels: VUB Press, 2008).
  3. J. Cassarino (ed.), Unbalanced Reciprocities: Cooperation on Readmission in the Euro-Mediterranean Area (Washington: The Middle East Institute, 2010).
  4. STEPS Study for the European Parliament, ‘The Conditions in Centres for Third Country Nationals (detention camps, open centres as well as transit centres and transit zones) with a Particular Focus on Provisions and Facilities for Persons with Special Needs in the 25 EU Member States’ IP/C/LIBE/IC/2006-181, December 2007.
  5. J. Cassarino, Readmission Policy in the European Union - Study for the European Parliament, PE 425.632, 2010.

Дополнительныематериалы

  1. N. A. Abell, ‘The Compatibility of Readmission Agreements with the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees’, International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 11, no.1 (1999), pр. 60–83.
  2. I. Kruse, ‘EU Readmission Policy and its Effects on Transit Countries – The Case of Albania’, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 8 (2006), pр. 115–142.
  3. M. Schieffer, ‘Community Readmission Agreements with Third Countries – Objectives, Substance and Current State of Negotiations’, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 3 (2003), pр. 343–357.
  4. D. Bouteillet-Paquet, ‘Passing the Buck: a critical analysis of the readmission policy implemented by the European Union and its Member States’, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 3 (2003), рp. 359–377.
  5. Л.Титоренко. Реадмиссия, Возвращение и Реинтеграция: Республика Беларусь. - Карим Восток – консорциум прикладных исследований по международной миграции, 2013.

Примечания редактора

Соглашения о реадмиссии призваны применяться для тех кому отказано в защите, а также для тех, кто подвержен принудительному возвращению в безопасную третью страну, либо безопасную страну происхождения. Проанализируйте, могут ли существующие соглашения ЕС о реадмиссии предоставить эффективные гарантии тем лицам, которые нуждаются в международной защите и кому грозит высылка в страну, осуществляющую преследование.