c. Temporary Protection

  Main Debates Adequacy of the 1951 Geneva Convention in Mass Flight Situations: Legally Binding Protection Norms v. Discretionary State Practices   Main Points Temporary Protection Is Not an Alternative to Convention Protection, but a Precursor to it (or to Subsidiary Protection) - until Individual Procedures Are Carried Out or Group Recognition Occurs UNHCR Documents UNCHR, 'Note on International Protection': UN doc. A/AC.96/830, 7 Sept. 1994, paras. 45-51.   Readings Core G. Goodwin-Gill and J. McAdam, The Refugee in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 340–342. [G. Goodwin-Gill, The Refugee in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 196–202].   Extended J. Fitzpatrick, ‘Temporary Protection of Refugees: Elements of a Formalized Regime’, American Journal of International Law, vol. 94, no. 2 (April 2000), pp. 279–306. G. Noll and J. Vedsted-Hansen, ‘Temporary Protection and Burden Sharing: Conditionalising Access Suspending Refugee Rights?’, in E. Guild and C. Harlow (eds), Implementing Amsterdam: Immigration and Asylum Rights in EC Law (Oxford: Hart, 2001), pp. 195–222.J. van Selm, ‘Temporarily Protecting Displaced Persons or Offering the Possibility to Start a New Life in the European Union’, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 3, no. 1 (2001), pp. 23–35.J. Vedsted-Hansen, ‘Collective Protection – Temporary Asylum on a Changing Basis’, in [Temporary Protection and Repatriation. Bosnian Refugees in the Nordic Countries], Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers 1999 (Nord 1999:4), pp. 15–44.