e. Internal Protection Alternative

  Main Debates Internal Flight Alternative v. Internal Protection Alternative Should Barriers to Access to Protection and to Secure an Existence Matter? Who has the Burden of Proof?   Main Points Absence of Persecution in One Region v. Access to  Genuine Protection Factors that Affect Practical Access to Protection Elsewhere Within Country of Origin: Logistical, Linguistic, Familial, Financial, etc.   Soft Law UNHCR, 'Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees', HCR/IP/4/Rev.1, 1979, para. 91.     UNHCR Documents UNHCR, 'Guidelines on International Protection: "Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative" within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees', 2003.   Cases New Zealand Refugee Appeal No. 71684/99 of 29 Oct. 1999 (decision of the Refugee Appeals Authority adopting the IPA principles of Michigan Guidelines) Rasaratnam v. Canada, F.C.J.  No. 1256 of 1990  (Canadian Court of Appeal decision holding that IPA requires no possibility of persecution in area of potential relocation rather than not unreasonable to seek refuge there) Duzdkiker  v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, FAC 390 of 2000 (Australian Federal Court decision applying IPA test of real protection and reasonableness of relocation)   Readings Core J. Hathaway and M. Foster, 'Internal Protection/Relocation/Flight Alternative as an Aspect of Refugee Status Determination' in E. Feller, V. Türk, and F. Nicholson (eds.) 'Refugee Protection in International Law' UNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 357-417. 'The Michigan Guidelines on the Internal Protection Alternative', April 1999.   Extended N. Kelley, 'Internal Flight/Relocation/Protection Alternative: Is It Reasonable?' (2002) 14 International Journal of Refugee Law  4. H. Storey, 'The Internal Flight Alternative Test: The Jurisprudence Re-examined' (1998) 10 International Journal of Refugee Law  506. ELENA, 'Research Paper on the Application of the Concept of Internal Protection Alternative' (1998 updated 2000).  

About the Reader

Section I Introduction to International Refugee Law: Background and Context


Section II International Framework for Refugee Protection


Section III European Framework for Refugee Protection


Section IV UNHCR and Other Actors Relevant to International Asylum Law




e. Internal Protection Alternative

 

Main Debates

Internal Flight Alternative v. Internal Protection Alternative

Should Barriers to Access to Protection and to Secure an Existence Matter?

Who has the Burden of Proof?

 

Main Points

Absence of Persecution in One Region v. Access to  Genuine Protection

Factors that Affect Practical Access to Protection Elsewhere Within Country of Origin: Logistical, Linguistic, Familial, Financial, etc.

 

Soft Law

UNHCR, 'Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees', HCR/IP/4/Rev.1, 1979, para. 91.

 

 

UNHCR Documents

UNHCR, 'Guidelines on International Protection: "Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative" within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees', 2003.

 

Cases

New Zealand Refugee Appeal No. 71684/99 of 29 Oct. 1999 (decision of the Refugee Appeals Authority adopting the IPA principles of Michigan Guidelines)

Rasaratnam v. Canada, F.C.J.  No. 1256 of 1990  (Canadian Court of Appeal decision holding that IPA requires no possibility of persecution in area of potential relocation rather than not unreasonable to seek refuge there)

Duzdkiker  v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, FAC 390 of 2000 (Australian Federal Court decision applying IPA test of real protection and reasonableness of relocation)

 

Readings

Core

J. Hathaway and M. Foster, 'Internal Protection/Relocation/Flight Alternative as an Aspect of Refugee Status Determination' in E. Feller, V. Türk, and F. Nicholson (eds.) 'Refugee Protection in International Law' UNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 357-417.

'The Michigan Guidelines on the Internal Protection Alternative', April 1999.

 

Extended

N. Kelley, 'Internal Flight/Relocation/Protection Alternative: Is It Reasonable?' (2002) 14 International Journal of Refugee Law  4.


H. Storey, 'The Internal Flight Alternative Test: The Jurisprudence Re-examined' (1998) 10 International Journal of Refugee Law  506. 

ELENA, 'Research Paper on the Application of the Concept of Internal Protection Alternative' (1998 updated 2000).

 



Soft Law

Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for determining Refugee Status

UNHCR, 'Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees', HCR/IP/4/Rev.1, 1979, para. 91.

UNHCR Documents

Guidelines on International Protection: "Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative" within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees

UNHCR, 'Guidelines on International Protection: "Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative" within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees', 2003.

Cases

New Zealand Refugee Appeal No. 71684/99

New Zealand Refugee Appeal No. 71684/99 of 29 Oct. 1999 (decision of the Refugee Appeals Authority adopting the IPA principles of Michigan Guidelines)

Rasaratnam v. Canada

Rasaratnam v. Canada, F.C.J.  No. 1256 of 1990 (Canadian Court of Appeal decision holding that IPA requires no possibility of persecution in part of country of relocation and not it not be unreasonable to see refuge there)

Duzdkiker v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Duzdkiker  v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, FAC 390 of 2000 (Australian Federal Court decision applying IPA test of real protection and reasonableness of relocation)

Readings

Core

you have to login to access this document

Internal Protection/Relocation/Flight Alternative as an Aspect of Refugee Status Determination

J. Hathaway and M. Foster, 'Internal Protection/Relocation/Flight Alternative as an Aspect of Refugee Status Determination' in E. Feller, V. Türk, and F. Nicholson (eds.) 'Refugee Protection in International Law' UNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 357-417.

The Michigan Guidelines on the Internal Protection Alternative

'The Michigan Guidelines on the Internal Protection Alternative', April 1999.

Extended

The Internal Flight Alternative Test: The Jurisprudence re-Examined

H. Storey, 'The Internal Flight Alternative Test: The Jurisprudence re-Examined' (1998) 101 International Journal of Refugee Law 506.

Internal Flight/Relocation/Protection Alternative: Is It Reasonable?

N. Kelley, 'Internal Flight/Relocation/Protection Alternative: Is It Reasonable?' (2002) 14 International Journal of Refugee Law 4.

Research Paper on the Application of the Concept of Internal Protection Alternative

ELENA, 'Research Paper on the Application of the Concept of Internal Protection Alternative' (1998 updated 2000).